|
|
Post by apokalypse1991 on Jun 29, 2012 20:57:41 GMT -5
An idea about the connection between local, national and international movements. Any thoughts? Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by notme on Jun 30, 2012 13:33:29 GMT -5
So as I said previously, awesome. I <3 it.
I would probably change 'march' to 'protest' just because I missed it on the first 2-3 readings of the diagram and was going to suggest it until I managed to catch it.
I would add, and I'm not sure about the wording, but law-fare in both the sense of non-state-based actors are problematic for national level legislation, but also for things like passing laws advantageous to small/local business.
I would probably integrate some level of politics, for instance, it would be awesome to see another push for getting initiative and referendum laws in all of the states, and finally get one at the federal level.
I've been trying to think all night how to fill out the international movements, I know in some ways that just the knowledge transfer has been useful. I immediately think of Spain and little things they did that I tried to bring back-- the open petition table being an example. I'd like to see the national movements come together and put pressure on the UN, in particular the security council, remove the idea of permanent members and their veto's, id like to see more of the U in UDHCR, et cetera.
I rather liked this though, awesome work. I'll pop in and out putting whatever I think of into it.
|
|
|
|
Post by apokalypse1991 on Jun 30, 2012 14:30:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Walkabout on Jun 30, 2012 20:22:19 GMT -5
It's so big... 0.0
|
|
|
|
Post by Walkabout on Jun 30, 2012 20:24:10 GMT -5
The only change I would request would be community outreach and direct action being a two way street. (so to speak) |
|
|
|
Post by Walkabout on Jun 30, 2012 22:25:42 GMT -5
Mind if we move this over to Action Items?
|
|
|
|
Post by apokalypse1991 on Jul 1, 2012 8:20:18 GMT -5
Don't mind at all
|
|
